The Joy of Teen Sex: ‘deals with teenagers’ real sex and sexual health problems’, according to Channel 4. Photograph: Channel 4

Channel 4 is facing criticism over its series The Joy of Teen Sex, with a group of health and education professionals calling on the broadcaster to set up an advisory group to inform future programming.

In a letter delivered to Channel 4 on Wednesday, signatories including Dr Stuart Flanagan, who features on Radio 1’s Sunday Surgery, and sex researcher and agony aunt Dr Petra Boynton, claim the broadcaster and the programme’s producers have not acted responsibly or fulfilled their public service remit.

The Joy of Teen Sex, which began on 19 January and concludes tonight, deals with teenagers’ “real” sex and sexual health problems, according to Channel 4.

However, the letter, signed by 23 health and education professionals and bodies, describes the series as “fitting a pattern of programme development where viewing figures are prioritised over empowerment but where programmes are still marketed as ‘educational'”.

In response to the criticism, Channel 4 issued a statement saying it was “proud of our programming in this field” and its “ability to bring large audiences to the often difficult issues they have addressed”.

“We have a hugely successful Sexperience website which has been consistently a leader in the field and has seen millions log on for further advice or information after watching the programmes. Anecdotally we also know from healthcare professionals that viewers have sought medical advice and treatment as a result of watching the programme,” the broadcaster added.

The letter to Channel 4 expresses the group’s unease about several key issues, including what they claim is the lack of qualified professionals on the show, poor advice, and inaccurate and misleading information.

They suggest that one way to rectify some of the damage caused by the series would be to establish an advisory group comprising sexual and reproductive health practitioners, sex education workers, youth workers, parents and young people to ensure that future programming on this theme will be empowering and accurate as well as entertaining.

Some of the experts first registered their concern over the show when they were approached for their input when it was in its planning stage. Justin Hancock, of sex education website BishUK, said: “I’m always concerned that primetime shows about young people are exploitative and invite viewers to be critical of young people. Sex and relationships for young people is complex and nuanced and factual entertainment shows only ever really scratch the surface of what is going on for young people.”

Pre-production, Hancock was assured by production company Betty that “our aim is to make a thought-provoking and positive series that will look at relationships, emotions and identity as well as ‘the act of sex'”.

The show has not lived up to those standards, according to Boynton, who was invited to apply for a presenter position on the programme.

“It has not represented the main worries young people have, nor talked about core issues of communication, respect or affection,” she said. “Given how the public have questions and concerns about sex and the media is a great place to share relationships information, I feel this was a shocking let down to young people and parents. The public deserve better.”

Channel 4 said that production company Betty had consulted “with a number of sexual healthcare professionals to ensure the information provided was accurate and appropriate”, but added “we realise that this type of programming will not always appeal to everyone”.

“Channel 4 is always willing to listen to the concerns of viewers and interested parties following its broadcasts and we will correspond with the authors of the letter directly about their concerns,” the broadcaster said.

• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000.

• If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly “for publication”.

I agree, a terrible program which was made to get high viewing figures not to inform. I would go as far to say it was irresponsible and bizarrely of all seemed to ignore the current advice and good practice on sex and relationships education. Very poor Channel 4. Very poor.

Lee Jackson
Schools Speaker on Relationships

Hi this is my new book, follow the link for more information…

‘Pushy parents’ help children make the grade at school

Parents who push their children to work hard at school have a bigger impact on their child’s academic success than their teachers, research suggests.

The effort a parent puts into ensuring their child buckles down to schoolwork has a greater impact than that put in by the child or the school, it says.

Researchers at Leicester and Leeds universities found parents put less effort in the more children they had.

They looked at how much they read to a child and attended school meetings.

And also at teachers’ perceptions of their involvement.

The academics used data from the National Child Development Study for pupils born in 1958.

And to judge how much was down to parental influences and how much was down to pupils being self-starting individuals, the researchers also studied the children’s attitudes, such as whether, at the age of 16, they thought school was a waste of time.

Family background

Schools were assessed on how they tried to involve parents, what disciplinary methods they used and and whether 16-year-olds were offered careers advice.

The findings suggest that there is something of a perfect circle. Parents encourage their children to make more of an effort, and then when their child tries harder, the parents put in even more effort.

The background of a family affects the schools’ effort, the study found.

Professor Gianni De Fraja, head of economics at Leicester University, said: “The main channel through which parental socio-economic background affects achievement is via effort.

“Parents from a more advantaged environment exert more effort, and this influences positively the educational attainment of their children.

“The parents’ background also increases the school’s effort, which increases the school achievement. Why schools work harder where parents are from a more privileged background we do not know. It might be because middle class parents are more vocal in demanding that the school works hard.”

The researchers found children were more likely to put more effort into their schooling if their parents showed that commitment too.

Professor De Fraja added: “We found that children work harder whose parents put more effort into their education.”

Big families

The report says parents put less effort into their children’s education the more offspring they have.

“There is a trade-off between quantity and quality of children: a child’s number of siblings influences negatively the effort exerted by that child’s parents toward that child’s education,” it says.

The researchers suggest policies aimed at improving parental effort – such as parenting classes – might help to boost children’s achievements.

The research is published in the latest issue of Review of Economics and Statistics.

I am sure that many owners of small businesses (SMEs) are considering what they are about to face in 2011. True, there are doom and gloom messages from the Government, not helped by David Cameron who, in covering his backside, stated that he sees 2011 as very challenging, still singing the same song, “We are cleaning up the mess we inherited.” A bit of the broken record syndrome, I think. My message to those who run a small business is that at this time of year it’s good to have a good look in the mirror and rethink your strategy. May I suggest that whatever plans you are thinking of, don’t – repeat don’t – rely upon government or banks or anybody else to give you ideas? Unless you sign on to the fact that it is you alone that runs your business, you will be going down the wrong road. It’s all about you. Consider why you started your business. I assume it was that you have some experience or expertise in your field, and that is the big point – don’t rely upon anyone else. It’s going to be you who defines the way forward. I am sick and tired of hearing people asking what to do, going to networking meetings and seminars expecting to glean some gems of wisdom. These events are money-making exercises and benefit one party and one party only: the organiser. They have become an escape for people to justify sitting around wasting a day bullshitting with each other while they should be working. You will learn nothing other than that there are another load of people in the same boat as you. Moaning about the banks is another thing that winds me up. Get real! Banks are a business just like you. They are there to make money from their customers and just like you, the more customers they have the more they will make for their shareholders. They are not a charity and they do not have to lend money to any Tom, Dick and Harry. They are not cheap – they’ll charge you to breathe, with arrangement fees and other costs.

They should only be used to your advantage. Consider the cost of money as if it is another expense you have to bear, no different from any other costs you have. But there has to be a reason why you need the money.

Ask yourself why you need the bank for money. What do you need it for? I spoke to a person who ran a dry-cleaning shop a while ago. He had obviously bought all his equipment a while back. His day-to-day consumables are just the chemicals he needs to clean the clothes. Those, plus his utility bills, rent and salaries, are his expenses. He has a cash business and yet he was moaning about the bank not lending to him. When I asked why he needed the money, he said he is in debt. “Why are you in debt?” I asked.

“You are not a shop that has to buy stock, so are you opening other branches? Do you need the money to buy new plant and equipment?” No, it was simple – he was running at an accumulative loss. So simple – his takings were less than his outgoings, and had been for ages. So he wanted the cash to pay his salary and his staff’s salary as his business could not generate it. Sorry mate, you are totally unjustified in complaining about a bank. They don’t back losers. You are insolvent – simple as that. What he needed to do is refocus and see how to start to make money and not just cover overheads.

It is incredible that the simple basics of business go out of the window with all of these modern-day so-called theories and principles. You don’t need spreadsheets and complex business plans; you need a pencil and a plain sheet of paper. Take my example of the dry-cleaner. On a sheet of paper he can write down his monthly costs of rent, utilities staff and consumables. From this he will get a figure that tells him that unless he takes in excess of that each month he will lose money. This is a quick sanity check, a wake-up call that all small businesses should do.

In my book What You See Is What You Get, I explained in detail that when I started my business in 1967, there were no free lunches. No banks lending. You wanted something? You paid for it or got it yourself. And when you could show that you had a good, viable business, then and only then would “come and see me” be the words of the bank manager.

I feel sorry for young people who have lived through the madness of the past 10 years or so and grown up with an expectancy culture. They witnessed irresponsible lending from banks to people who had a whim of an idea. It’s all over folks! Banks are now back to the old days. Forget them unless you have a clear road map of how you will repay them or how you can make money from these expensive loans.

It’s hard for me in this article to cater for all aspects of business. I am conscious that there are service businesses such as recruitment and estate agencies where the only asset is the people. There are people who make things and sell them (not enough I would say) – there are hairdressers, car repairers and a variety of shopkeepers. The principle is the same whatever business you are in.

As mundane as it might sound, I did a health check every week when I started. I was conscious of my expenses, including my pay, as well as the cost price of the goods I was selling.

As mad as it might sound, I wanted to cover my expense by Wednesday of every week so that profits made on Thursday and Friday were going to accumulate to net assets. I needed targets. There were weeks when I didn’t make it and I had to find the determination to step up a gear the next week to try to make up the deficit. You are the only one who knows what to do with your business. There is no shame in looking at your competitors or reading up on what new trends and ideas are around. By all means spend valuable time at exhibitions.

Consider, if you are a shop, for example, that while you have a mass of overheads, any new venture you might wish to diversify into – product- or service-wise – can be done with little or no increment of your existing overhead. Think of expanding your range of products or services. Look at the climate and see what new services are required these days.

Just as one example, if you are in the recruitment industry, health and safety is now a big thing with firms. Trust me, you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to gen up on it. Instead of wasting your time at networking seminars, you may as well sit in your own premises and research it, and then perhaps add providing H&S people to companies as one of your offerings.

In my early days, I used my suppliers to finance my stock. The bank would not touch me with a barge pole. First of all, you need to build up trust with your suppliers. Treat them as if you have a tax bill or electricity bill. They must be paid on time. There is nothing wrong in establishing extended terms such as 30-60 or even 90 days. The suppliers will go along with it if you build a history of trust with them.

But never buy more than you would normally buy just for the sake of it. You have to pay and you can only pay if you sell it, and by that I mean make a profit, not just turn over. A retail business sells for cash and if you have suppliers who offer you terms, you can use this cash flow to stock up with a more diverse range. That’s business.

I conclude by saying again that it is you and only you – no one else. You know what to do, otherwise you should not be in business. It’s just down to hard work, discipline and determination combined with your knowledge and experience of your sector. Trust me, you will be satisfied and happy with yourself.

• Baron Sugar of Clapton was Enterprise Champion under the Labour government and is chairman of Amshold Group and Amsprop London.

Business is about getting on with it AND networking and learning new stuff!

There is no room for moaning – but there is room to build relationships with others to help you grow faster Lord Sugar or Sir Alan or whatever your name is 🙂

People I know well /  have worked with which you may find useful…I love to recommend people…

www.robthejoiner.co.uk – Rob Fry – he built my office! Reliable and trustworthy.

www.barakagarforth.co.uk – The best coffee in Leeds, based in Garforth near the A1/M1 link road.

www.bouncycastleleeds.co.uk – Bouncy Castles! Ask for Nigel

www.mantocreativemedia.co.uk – corporate / charity video production – ask for Paul

www.steve-pepper.co.uk – Health, safety and hygiene training – ask for Steve

BHS Kirkstall Leeds – my favourite breakfast hang out – lovely friendly people

www.mrblinc.com – my designer – ask for Nathan

www.larddesigns.com – my other designer – ask for Lloyd

www.lmgascoyne.co.uk – Linda Gascoyne a great trainer, facilitator and HR expert

www.circleleafletprinting.co.uk – cheapest reliable online printer

www.paulyoungdesign.com – my web designer (inc. wordpress templates)

www.moo.com – cheap nice looking short run business cards